SolidBowtie

Loss of containment — storage tank

The classic process-safety bowtie: corrosion, overfill, ignition sources and impact around an atmospheric hydrocarbon tank.

HazardHydrocarbons stored under pressure in atmospheric tanks
Top eventLoss of containment

5 threats 19 barriers 4 consequences safety-critical barriers marked

Use this template free. Copy “Loss of containment — storage tank” into your own workspace and adapt every barrier — no credit card.

Start free with this template →

Threats & preventive barriers

Each threat is a credible pathway to the top event; its barriers interrupt that pathway before control is lost.

Corrosion of tank shell

  • Risk-based inspection programme

    Socio-technical · 80% effective · Owner: Integrity Engineer

    📅 Wall-thickness survey · quarterly keep-alive task

  • Corrosion coupons & monitoring

    Continuous · 85% effective · Owner: Integrity Engineer

  • Cathodic protection system

    Passive (hardware) · 80% effective · Owner: Corrosion Engineer

Overfilling during transfer

  • Independent high-level alarm

    Socio-technical · 80% effective · Owner: Control Room Supervisor

    Alarm flooding

    Operator fatigue on night shift

  • High-high level auto-shutdown (SIF) ★ critical

    Active hardware · 95% effective · Owner: Instrument Reliability Engineer

    📅 Proof test (full stroke) · semiannual keep-alive task

External impact (vehicle strike)

  • Crash barriers & bollards

    Passive (hardware) · 90% effective · Owner: Site HSE Manager

  • Traffic management plan

    Behavioural (human) · 70% effective · Owner: Logistics Coordinator

Internal overpressure

  • Pressure/vacuum relief valve ★ critical

    Passive (hardware) · 88% effective · Owner: Mechanical Engineer

    📅 PV valve inspection · annual keep-alive task

  • Nitrogen blanketing control

    Active hardware · 80% effective · Owner: Process Engineer

Static discharge during filling

  • Bonding & earthing of fill lines

    Passive (hardware) · 85% effective · Owner: Operations Lead

  • Reduced initial fill rate

    Behavioural (human) · 70% effective · Owner: Operations Lead

Consequences & recovery barriers

Once the top event happens, recovery barriers limit each consequence.

Pool fire

  • Fire & gas detection

    Active hardware · 80% effective · Owner: Instrument Reliability Engineer

    📅 Detector calibration · quarterly keep-alive task

  • Foam deluge fire suppression ★ critical

    Active hardware · 90% effective · Owner: Fire Officer

    📅 Flow & functional test · annual keep-alive task

Spill to watercourse

  • Bund / secondary containment ★ critical

    Passive (hardware) · 95% effective · Owner: Site HSE Manager

    📅 Bund integrity inspection · annual keep-alive task

  • Interceptor & drainage isolation

    Socio-technical · 80% effective · Owner: Environmental Lead

Toxic vapour cloud

  • Perimeter gas detection & alarms

    Active hardware · 70% effective · Owner: Instrument Reliability Engineer

  • Emergency response & evacuation plan

    Behavioural (human) · 75% effective · Owner: Emergency Coordinator

    📅 Evacuation drill · semiannual keep-alive task

Escalation to adjacent tanks

  • Tank spacing & fire walls ★ critical

    Passive (hardware) · 85% effective · Owner: Engineering Manager

  • Water-spray cooling on neighbours

    Active hardware · 80% effective · Owner: Fire Officer

Copying this template gives you a fully editable bowtie: barrier owners arrive as role suggestions, escalation factors sit on their barriers, and keep-alive activities are scheduled from the moment you copy. New to the notation? Read what the bowtie method is or browse the practical guides.

Use this template free. Copy “Loss of containment — storage tank” into your own workspace and adapt every barrier — no credit card.

Start free with this template →